Skip to content
RevOps Shop
Contact Us

Clay for Marketing: ABM Done Right, with Audience Matching

Clay lets a marketing team build its own account data, size every account by revenue potential, and match each person to the one campaign that fits who they are and what they are researching. That is what account-based marketing was supposed to be. This page covers why Clay works for marketers, what gets in the way, how it fits your stack, and the three ABM plays we run first.

On this page

Clay for Marketing

The one-seat Gmail signup was Parsons Corporation

Gmail signup → enrich in Clay → Parsons Corporation → 407 seats

407seats of revenue potential

Before enrichment

Company
Unknown
Employees
Unknown
Industry
Unknown
Email
Personal Gmail address
Seats purchased
1
Revenue potential
Unknown

After enrichment

Company
Parsons Corporation
Employees
16,500
Custom industry
Architectural Design & Visualization
Revenue
$6.75B
Segment
Large
Revenue potential
407 seats
  • Clay automation
A real Chaos account: one Gmail signup, one seat, 407 seats of revenue potential. Source: Chaos CMO presentation.

We are RevOps Shop, an official Clay partner. We have been building in Clay since around workspace #9,000, and Clay runs inside almost every client we work with. We work in Salesforce, Dynamics, or any CRM with an API.

Why should marketing teams consider Clay?

Because ABM breaks on data, not on ads. Most marketing teams target accounts using industry and size fields they did not choose and cannot trust. Clay lets you define the fields that match how you actually sell, fill them from 150+ data providers plus AI research, and push the result to your CRM and ad platforms.

Here is the problem in one record. Chaos, a 3D-visualization software company, had a customer who signed up with a Gmail address and bought one seat. In the CRM that looked like a small account. After enrichment, that person worked at Parsons Corporation: 16,500 employees and room for 407 seats. Nothing about the original record told marketing that account mattered.

It was not only personal emails. Business-email accounts that looked known were re-scored too. One account with 2 seats had room for 6. Another with 10 seats had room for 32. Across the base, revenue potential showed 3 to 6 times more addressable seats than customers had bought.

Why Clay is the marketer's secret tool

Every data vendor sells the same fields to you and your competitors. Industry, employee count, revenue band. Useful, but they are not an edge.

Clay's real value for marketing is the data nobody sells. Seat potential by industry. Your own industry categories. Whether a software company is vertical or horizontal. Whether a site visitor's role fits the service line they were reading about. You build those fields once, in your own Clay workspace, and they keep filling as new accounts arrive.

That changes what marketing can promise. Instead of "we ran ads to every manufacturing account," you can say "we ran ads to the manufacturing accounts with the most revenue potential, and here is why each one is on the list."

What roadblocks do marketers hit when getting started with Clay?

The most common roadblocks are starting with tables instead of a targeting plan, trusting default industry fields, enriching every record and burning credits, and tables that quietly stop running after launch. None of these are Clay problems. They are design problems, and each one has a known fix.

Roadblocks

Where marketing teams get stuck, and the fix

Roadblock → what it looks like → the fix

Where marketing teams get stuck, and the fix
RoadblockWhat it looks likeThe fix
1. Starting with the toolA big table and no decisionPick the 2 or 3 fields that change spend, build only those
2. Default industry fieldsAds and messages aimed at the wrong segmentBuild a custom industry list from your wins
3. Enriching everythingCredits gone in week twoGate expensive steps by revenue potential
4. Personal emails and anonymous trafficAccounts you cannot nameEmail to LinkedIn to company, with confidence checks
5. Fear of the CRM syncOps blocks the projectDedicated enriched fields, fill blanks only
6. Tables that quietly stopCampaign volume drops, no errorRow, credit and error checks on a schedule
7. No owner after launchLogic drifts, costs creepOne named owner and a monthly checklist

1. Starting with the tool, not the target. Teams open Clay, pull a list, and start adding columns. Two weeks later they have a big table and no decision. Start by writing down the two or three fields that would change who you spend money on. Then build only those.

2. Trusting default industry fields. LinkedIn industry is self-reported and often wrong. In the Chaos build, LinkedIn's list had 349 industries, and about 5% were relevant to how Chaos sells. Clay's standard list had 82, about 12% relevant. The custom list we built had 10 values, all of them relevant. LinkedIn called Parsons "Civil Engineering." For Chaos, Parsons is an architectural design and visualization firm. That difference changes the message, the ad, and the case study you show.

Roadblock 2

Default industry lists miss how you sell

349 LinkedIn industries → 82 Clay industries → 10 custom values

100%of custom values relevant
LinkedIn: Civil EngineeringCustom: Architectural Design & Visualization(Parsons)
  • Clay automation
Chaos industry taxonomy, before and after. Source: Chaos CMO presentation.

3. Enriching everything. Credits go fast when every row gets every lookup. Set thresholds first. In the Chaos build, .edu emails skipped enrichment entirely, and mobile number lookups only ran when an account had 5 or more potential seats and sat in a target industry.

4. Personal emails and anonymous traffic. Product-led and ecommerce companies have this worst. 37% of Chaos accounts signed up with a personal email and no company attached. You need a path from a Gmail address to a LinkedIn profile to a company, with a confidence check at each step.

5. Ops is afraid of the CRM sync. And they should be, if Clay can overwrite what reps entered. The fix is simple: enriched data writes to dedicated fields, and Clay fills blanks but never overwrites rep-entered or billing data.

6. Tables that quietly stop. Clay tables cap at 50,000 rows, and each webhook source has its own 50,000-call limit. When credits run low, scheduled tables can skip cells without an error. Data vendors change their APIs without notice. A marketing team without an owner for this finds out when campaign volume drops.

7. No owner after launch. Someone has to own the logic, the costs, and the fixes. If that person is a marketer with a full calendar, the program drifts.

What benefits do marketing teams see using Clay?

Marketing teams using Clay well get segments that match how they sell, ad spend focused on accounts with known revenue potential, new named accounts surfaced from signups and site visits, and campaigns that only fire when the person and the message fit. They also get a lower cost per record than buying one vendor's full dataset.

Segments that match how you sell. Chaos leadership believed about 90% of customers were architecture, engineering and construction firms. The enriched data showed it was about half. It also showed reseller partners sold 50 to 100% more seats per customer than direct sales. That is a different marketing plan.

Ad spend on accounts you know are worth it. When every account has a revenue potential value, you can build retargeting audiences from the accounts with the most room to grow instead of guessing.

New named accounts. A free-email signup that resolves to a large enterprise becomes a named account overnight. Marketing can run a coordinated program at contacts it could not even identify before.

Campaigns that only fire when it fits. At SC&H, a professional services firm, Clay became the routing layer between website visitor data, intent data, the CRM and the outreach tools. More than 4,200 contacts were filtered down to 3,100 that matched the ideal customer profile, routed daily. Reply rates went up 3x.

Real unit costs. Across 200,692 records in the Chaos build, total data cost was $10,573, or $0.0527 per record. That number includes AI, Clay credits and direct API costs.

Data sales will actually use. Every AI answer in the Chaos build carries a confidence score, shown as High, Medium or Low, and the results were checked against the client's own 250-record spot-check. Blanks stay visible, because what you could not find tells sales something too.

What are the main Clay competitors for marketing, and where do they fall short?

The tools marketers usually compare with Clay are ZoomInfo, Apollo, Cognism, Clearbit, ABM platforms like 6sense and Demandbase, and signal platforms like Common Room. Most are good at what they sell. Where they fall short for marketing is that you get their data model, not yours. Clay sits on top of them and lets you build your own.

Competitors

Keep your data vendor. Clay is the layer on top.

Their fields → your fields, built in Clay

Keep your data vendor. Clay is the layer on top.
ToolBest atWhere marketers get stuckUse it with Clay?
ZoomInfo3Deep North American company and contact data, intentAnnual, quote-only contracts; their fields, not yours; reviewers cite thinner EMEA coverageYes, as one provider in a waterfall
Apollo3Self-serve data plus sequencing, free tierUS-heavy coverage; one database's view of your marketYes, as one provider in a waterfall
Cognism4UK and European data, phone-verified mobilesQuote-only annual; less useful if you sell mostly in North AmericaYes, for EMEA phone and email steps
Clearbit1Was a popular API for enrichment and form fillAcquired by a CRM vendor in 2023; free tools shut down April 30, 2025; standalone API closed to new customersOnly if you already have legacy access
ABM platforms (6sense, Demandbase)Account-level intent and ad deliveryTheir industry and fit fields are theirs, not yours; custom data is hard to addOften, with Clay feeding custom fields in
Common Room5First-party signals from community, product and webBuilt around its own model; less flexible for data nobody sellsYes, Common Room says the two are used together
Persana2Was an AI prospecting toolJoined Rox in April 2026; standalone platform shut down May 2, 2026No longer available standalone
ClayOrchestrates 150+ providers plus AI research into your own fieldsNeeds design and upkeepThis is the layer
  1. clearbit.com/changelog
  2. persana.ai migration guide
  3. destackd comparison
  4. Cognism EMEA comparison
  5. commonroom.io/compare/clay
  • Clay automation

A few things worth knowing before you choose:

You probably keep one of them. Clay is not a replacement for every data vendor. Many of our clients keep ZoomInfo or Apollo and run it inside a Clay waterfall next to other providers. Clay's own pricing page says you can bring your own API keys, which skips Clay's data credits for that provider.

Single-vendor risk is real. Two tools that used to show up on every comparison list are no longer standalone products. Clearbit was acquired by a CRM vendor in December 2023, its free tools were shut down on April 30, 2025, and its standalone API is no longer offered to new customers. Persana joined Rox in April 2026 and its standalone platform shut down on May 2, 2026. In a Clay waterfall, losing one provider means reordering a column, not rebuilding your program.

No single provider covers everything. Clay reports that in its 2025 work email benchmark, no single provider cleared both 95% quality and 90% coverage. That is the whole case for a waterfall.

Regional coverage varies a lot. Reviewers commonly describe ZoomInfo as strongest in North America, and Cognism as strongest in the UK and Europe, especially for phone-verified mobile numbers. If you sell globally, plan for it on day one. In the Chaos build we used regional phone providers and reached 63% phone coverage on qualified EMEA contacts and 57% in APAC.

How should marketers think about Clay in their stack?

Think of Clay as the data and decision layer between your sources and your channels. It is not your CRM, your ad platform, or your email tool. Sources go in, one decision comes out, and that decision gets pushed everywhere: CRM fields, ad audiences, email lists, and rep tasks.

The stack

Where Clay sits in the marketing stack

Sources → Clay layer → CRM, ads, email and reps

Sources

  • CRM records
  • Product signups
  • Website visitors
  • Intent data
  • Data vendors (waterfall)
  • Company websites and LinkedIn

Clay layer

  • Dedupe and cooldown
  • Provider waterfall, cheapest first
  • AI classify with confidence
  • Revenue potential
  • Audience matching (persona x interest)

One decision, pushed everywhere.

Destinations

  • CRM fields (Salesforce, Dynamics, any CRM with an API)
  • LinkedIn and Meta ad audiences
  • Email and LinkedIn sequences
  • Rep tasks
  • Reporting
  • Source or destination
  • Clay automation

Five rules keep the stack clean:

  1. The CRM stays the system of record. Salesforce, Dynamics, or any CRM with an API. Clay reads from it and writes back to it, but the CRM is where reporting lives.
  2. Clay writes to dedicated fields. Name them clearly, like Enriched Industry or Enriched Employee Count, so nobody confuses them with what a rep typed.
  3. One revenue potential field decides who gets what. Ads, email, and sales should all read the same value. If three tools rank accounts three different ways, people stitch them together by hand.
  4. Marketing owns the logic, RevOps owns the sync rules. Marketing decides what makes an account worth spending on. RevOps decides what Clay may write, where, and when. We cover the RevOps side in Clay for RevOps.
  5. Pick the right Clay plan for the job. CRM auto-sync, webhooks, and pushing audiences to LinkedIn and Meta ads are listed on Clay's Growth plan and above.

If you are deciding what to build first, start with fields, not channels. Channels are easy to connect once the fields are right.

What are the 3 most important plays to run in Clay for an ABM program?

Start with these three, in this order: build your own industry and revenue potential fields, set up audience matching so each person lands in the one campaign that fits, and turn hidden accounts from signups and site visits into named ABM accounts. Each play feeds the next.

Play 1: Build your own industry and revenue potential fields

Play 1

Build your own industry and revenue potential fields

Closed-won deals → custom segments → sized accounts in the CRM

70.8%industry match vs a 70% target
Goal

Every account has your industry and a revenue potential value.

Inputs
  • Closed-won deals
  • Account list
  • Company websites
  • LinkedIn
Clay steps
  1. Define segments
  2. Scrape then classify
  3. Confidence 1 to 10
  4. Size revenue potential
  5. Write to enriched fields
Lands in the CRM as
  • Enriched industry
  • Revenue potential
  • Confidence (High, Medium, Low)
Measure
  • Industry match rate on a sample
  • Share of accounts with revenue potential
Where it breaks
  • AI asked to invent data
  • Too many segments
  • No spot-check

Chaos 1,000-record proof: 99.1% industries mapped, 97% company LinkedIn found, 80.4% personal LinkedIn found. Full run: 70.8% industry match vs a 70% target.

  • Clay automation
  • Exception or drop
  • Found or passes

This is the foundation. Without it, every campaign after it inherits bad targeting.

  1. Define segments from your own wins. Pull closed-won deals and group them the way your sales team talks about customers. Keep it short. Chaos ended up with 10 values. DealRoom, an M&A software company, built 16 segments from its 2025 deal data.
  2. Classify with a scrape first, AI second. Pull the company's live website and LinkedIn data, then let AI pick a segment from your list. Do not let AI invent data. Use it to classify what a reliable source returned.
  3. Score confidence. Give every AI answer a 1 to 10 confidence score and show it as High, Medium, or Low. Spot-check a sample against what your team knows.
  4. Size revenue potential. For Chaos, that meant counting people in target job titles at each account, by industry, to estimate potential seats. Your version might be locations, fleet size, or headcount in a department.
  5. Write it back to dedicated CRM fields. Then build segments in the CRM from those fields.

Prove it small first. Chaos started with 1,000 records: 99.1% of industries mapped, 97% of company LinkedIn pages found, and 80.4% of personal LinkedIn profiles found. Then it ran across all 170,000 accounts, reaching a 70.8% industry match rate against a 70% target, including personal-email accounts with no company signal at all.

Play 2: Audience matching, so every person lands in the right campaign

Play 2

Persona x Interest = Campaign

Who they are + what they research → one campaign, or the contact waits

Persona segment and Messaging segment make the Campaign segmentPersona segment: who they are. Messaging segment: what they are researching. Overlap: Campaign segment, which campaign.Personasegmentwho they areMessagingsegmentwhat they areresearchingCampaignsegmentwhichcampaign

AI from title, bio, company industry, size, type, location

Rules from pages viewed and intent topics

Persona segmentwho they areAI from title, bio, company industry, size, type, location
Messaging segmentwhat they are researchingRules from pages viewed and intent topics
Campaign segmentwhich campaign
Finance persona + Oracle content = Oracle campaign

Stays blank

Persona and interest do not overlapPersona = NoneInterest unknown

Generic pages (About, Industries, Insights) are not mapped.

CRM campaign fieldLinkedIn matched audienceMeta audienceEmail sequence
  • Clay automation
  • Skipped or stops
How SC&H matches people to campaigns.

Audience matching means a contact only enters a campaign when two things line up: who they are, and what they are interested in. If either is missing, they wait. That one rule cuts most of the noise out of ABM.

Here is how SC&H runs it:

  • Persona segment (who they are). AI reads the person's title and LinkedIn bio, plus the company's industry, size, type and location, and assigns one of a few service-line personas, or None.
  • Messaging segment (what they are interested in). Deterministic rules, not AI. Each intent topic and each website page maps to a topic. Generic pages like About, Industries and Insights are deliberately left unmapped, because visiting them does not signal interest in a service.
  • Campaign segment (which campaign). A calculated field that only fills when persona and messaging overlap. A finance persona reading Oracle content gets the Oracle campaign. A finance persona reading IT content gets nothing.

Two details make this durable. First, when the website adds a new page, a Clay table catches it and AI assigns it a messaging segment, so the mapping keeps up without a person maintaining a spreadsheet. Second, all three segments live on the contact record, so there is one place to look.

The same logic drives paid media. Push each campaign segment, or each revenue potential tier, to LinkedIn or Meta as its own matched audience. The ad and the email then say the same thing to the same people.

Play 3: Turn hidden accounts into named ABM accounts

Play 3

Hidden accounts become named accounts

Signup or site visit → identify → size → sales or nurture

12 to 14minutes from new order to scored account
Signups
Personal email
LinkedIn profile found
Company identified
Match validated
Site visitors
Visit
Clay webhook
Dedupe
LinkedIn, location, AI fit check, email validation
Look up existing CRM record
Create or update
Revenue potential
High potential
Sales + ABM ad audience
Lower potential
Nurture

Direct dials only above the revenue potential bar.

  • Source or destination
  • Clay automation
  • Found or passes
  • Skipped or stops
Chaos signups and site-visitor flows, combined. Real time at Chaos: 12 to 14 minutes from new order to scored account, about 800 a day.

Your best accounts may already be in your data, hiding behind a personal email, a one-seat purchase, or an anonymous site visit.

  1. Resolve personal emails. Trace a Gmail address to a LinkedIn profile, then to the company. Validate the match before you trust it.
  2. De-anonymize site visitors. A visitor identification tool sends each visit to a Clay webhook table. Dedupe first, so each person is enriched only once. Then pull the LinkedIn profile, check location, run an AI fit check, clean the company name, and validate the email.
  3. Look up before you create. Check whether the person or company already exists in the CRM. Update if they do, create if they do not.
  4. Route by revenue potential. High potential accounts go to sales and to an ABM ad audience. Lower potential accounts go to nurture. Free-email signups that resolve to enterprises become named accounts.
  5. Gate the expensive steps. Only look up direct dials for the accounts that clear your revenue potential bar.

At Chaos, this is now real time. Each new order triggers a webhook to Clay, runs the waterfall in 12 to 14 minutes, and lands back in Salesforce as a scored account, about 800 records a day.

For the sales side of this play, including signals and outreach, see Clay for Sales.

How do you keep a Clay ABM program healthy after launch?

Check four things on a schedule: row counts against the 50,000-row cap, Clay and provider credit balances, error rates by column, and whether scheduled runs actually ran. Most Clay failures are silent. A column that stops filling looks fine until campaign volume drops.

After launch

Keep a Clay ABM program healthy

Rows, credits, errors and runs → caught before campaign volume drops

50,000rows per table, hard cap
  • Row counts vs 50,000 capEvery 2 weeks
  • Clay and provider creditsEvery 2 weeks
  • Error filter, spot-check 10 rowsMonthly
  • Scheduled runs actually ranDay after each run
  • Monitoring fields: requested, completed, open requestAlways on
  • Found or passes
  • Wait or threshold
  • Exception or drop

What we put in place on every build:

  • Monitoring fields. Requested date, completed date, and an open-request flag on each record, feeding a simple failure dashboard. At Chaos, this caught a sync gap early.
  • A 90-day cooldown. Records are not re-enriched more than once every 90 days, so credits go where they matter.
  • A shared company table. No company gets paid for twice just because three of its people signed up.
  • A fallback in every waterfall. Days before the Chaos deadline, the LinkedIn data provider at the heart of the waterfall pushed an unannounced change that cut accuracy and volume. Because the build had options, the core backfill still shipped on the deadline.
  • Row count thresholds. Plan a table migration at 40,000 rows and do it by 48,000, before the hard stop at 50,000.

Working with a Clay rep right now?

If you are talking to Clay about marketing use cases, ask your rep to walk through the diagrams on this page with you. Every diagram has its own link. We work alongside Clay's team on live deals, answer CRM and integration questions on the call, and build in your own Clay workspace so the data stays yours.

How much does it cost to implement Clay for marketing?

We price by the play. Each play we build is a Marketing Sculpture: one play, built in your Clay workspace, on one object type, with one native integration included. Each Marketing Sculpture is $10,000. If more than 100,000 accounts are in scope, or you need a custom integration, we scope it with you.

Pricing

Marketing Sculptures: one play, one price

One play → one object type → one native integration

$10,000per Sculpture

“Build me a custom ABM list using a custom signal I have in mind.”

Accounts matching your signal, sized by revenue potential, in your CRM with the reason each one is there.

Object: AccountsIntegration: CRM

$10,000

Accounts and the contacts at those accounts: 2 Sculptures, $20,000.

“Match every contact to the one campaign that fits who they are and what they are researching.”

Persona, messaging and campaign segments on every contact.

Object: ContactsIntegration: CRM

$10,000

“Build LinkedIn ad audiences from our accounts with the most revenue potential, and keep them in sync.”

One LinkedIn audience per revenue potential tier, updated as accounts move.

Object: AccountsIntegration: LinkedIn ads

$10,000

1 play = 1 Sculpture1 object type per Sculpture1 native integration includedCustom integrations: scopedOver 100,000 accounts: scoped, contact us
Marketing Sculptures: one play, one object type, one native integration, $10,000 each.

Three Marketing Sculptures that fit an ABM program:

You ask forWhat we buildPrice
"Build me a custom ABM list using a custom signal I have in mind."We turn your signal into a Clay workflow, find the accounts that match it, size each one by revenue potential, and load the list into your CRM with the reason each account is on it.$10,000
"Match every contact to the one campaign that fits who they are and what they are researching."Persona, messaging and campaign segments on every contact in your CRM, the rules that map your pages and intent topics, and a table that classifies new pages as you publish them. This is the SC&H method from Play 2.$10,000
"Build LinkedIn ad audiences from our accounts with the most revenue potential, and keep them in sync."Revenue potential and a tier on every target account, with one LinkedIn matched audience per tier that updates as accounts move between tiers.$10,000

How Marketing Sculptures are priced:

  • One play per Sculpture. Each Sculpture is one play, built and running in your own Clay workspace.
  • One object type per Sculpture. A Sculpture runs on one CRM object, such as accounts, contacts or leads. A custom ABM list built on accounts and then on the contacts at those accounts is two Sculptures, $20,000.
  • One native integration included. Your CRM, your marketing automation or sending tool, or your ad platform. Salesforce and Dynamics both have native Clay integrations. A custom integration, such as a CRM Clay can only reach through its API, is scoped separately.
  • More than 100,000 accounts in scope? Pricing is scoped. Contact us.
  • Clay plan requirements still apply. Some features, like CRM sync and webhooks, are listed on Clay's Growth plan and above.

See every Sculpture side by side on Implement Clay Today: Sales, Marketing, and RevOps Matrix.

Frequently asked questions

Is Clay good for account-based marketing?

Yes, if you use it to build your own targeting data. Clay pulls from 150+ providers and AI research, so you can create fields like custom industry and revenue potential, then push them to your CRM and ad platforms. ABM gets better because the account list gets better.

What is audience matching in Clay?

Audience matching means a contact only enters a campaign when who they are and what they are interested in line up. A persona field (from title, bio and company data) and an interest field (from pages viewed and intent topics) combine into a campaign field. If they do not overlap, the contact waits.

Can Clay push audiences to LinkedIn ads?

Yes. Clay's pricing page lists pushing audiences to LinkedIn and Meta ad platforms on the Growth plan and above. We push each revenue potential tier or campaign segment as its own audience, so ads and emails reach the same people with the same message.

Do we need to replace ZoomInfo or Apollo to use Clay?

No. Many teams keep one data vendor and run it inside a Clay waterfall next to others. Clay tries providers in order and stops at the first good result. You can bring your own API keys, which skips Clay's data credits for that provider.

How much does Clay enrichment cost per record?

It depends on what you enrich and how you gate it. In our Chaos build, total data cost across 200,692 records was $10,573, or $0.0527 per record, including AI, Clay credits and direct APIs. Gating phone lookups to high-value accounts and using a 90-day cooldown kept it there.

Does Clay work with Salesforce?

Yes. Clay can import from Salesforce reports and list views, look up records, and create, update or upsert them. Upsert needs an external ID field. Our largest Clay build runs on a single Salesforce org with 170,000 accounts. We also work in Dynamics or any CRM with an API.

How long does it take to get ABM running in Clay?

It depends on the play and how much data is in scope. The Chaos backfill of 170,000 accounts was delivered 45 days after terms were agreed. Smaller plays move faster. We agree the timeline when we scope your Marketing Sculpture.

What is revenue potential, and how is it different from a fit score?

A fit score says whether an account looks like your customers. Revenue potential estimates how much that account could buy, for example the number of seats based on people in target roles. You need both. A small perfect-fit account and a large perfect-fit account deserve different budgets.

What is a Marketing Sculpture?

A Marketing Sculpture is one marketing play, such as a custom ABM list or audience matching, built in your Clay workspace on one object type with one native integration included. Each one is $10,000. More than 100,000 accounts in scope, or a custom integration, is scoped separately.

Sources

Need help with Clay? Contact us.

We start with your data and your targeting plan, then build in your Clay, with your keys, in Salesforce, Dynamics, or any CRM with an API. Your IT team can see everything we touch. We work best with B2B companies with at least 100 employees.

Start with one Sculpture, or compare every Sculpture across sales, marketing and RevOps. Already on Clay and a play is not working? We can rebuild it as a Sculpture in your workspace.

Contact Us